Legal Opinion

William Gillmore and Jean Gillmore v. Procter & Gamble Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 31, 1969No. 18936_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs-appellants, William and Jean Gillmore, sued defendant-appellee, Procter & Gamble Company, for the sum of $47,500. Their complaint alleged that such amount was due them as winners of a contest initiated by Procter & Gamble to promote sales of its product Oxydol. The contest was called “Oxydol’s $75,000 Traveler’s Game Contest” and blanks to be completed by those intending to participate in the contest were distributed in Kansas where plaintiffs reside. The contest consisted of matching various “clues” set out in the rules of the game to a list of cities of the world also listed in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Furgiele v. Disabled American Veterans Service FoundationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  2. Baez v. Disabled American Veterans Service FoundationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Albert White v. Turfway Park Racing Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. Leach v. Newport Yellow Cab, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
  3. Baskin v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1974
  4. Johnson v. BP Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Burt v. Blue Shield of Southwest OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API