Legal Opinion
Evident Corp. v. Church & Dwight Co.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 22, 2005No. 2003-1541PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Evident Corporation and Peroxydent Group appeal from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granting Church & Dwight’s motion for attorney fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285. Evident Corp. v. Church & Dwight Co., Inc., No. 97-3275 (D.N.J. June 30, 2003) (“Attorney Fee Opinion”). They also challenge the district court’s jurisdiction on the ground that Evident lacked standing to bring the suit. Because the district court had jurisdiction over the suit and did not abuse its discretion by holding Evident and Peroxydent jointly and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Prima Tek II, L.L.C. v. A-Roo Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Morrow Ex Rel. General Unsecured Creditors' Liquidating Trust of at Home Corp. v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Evident Corporation v. Church & Dwight Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. v. Globus Medical, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Hytera Communications Corp. Ltd. v. Motorola Solutions, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
- KNAUF FIBER GLASS, GMBH v. Certainteed Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.