Legal Opinion

Ropes v. Minshew

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

This case was decided by the court Bn Banc. Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Volusia county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Hocker, J,

— -The defendants in error sued the plaintiff in error in an action of ejectment to recover lot 3 except southeast 10 acres, sec. 29, township T5, range twenty-eight, containing sixty-five acres of land. On the trial the court directed the jury to find a verdict for the plaintiffs below, whereupon they rendered the following verdict: “We, the jury, find for the plaintiffs and that they are entitled to a fee simple estate to lot 3, except S. E. 10 acres, section twenty-nine, township fifteen, south, range twenty-nine east.” A judgment for the plaintiffs was rendered in the following…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoodless v. JerniganSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  2. Ellis v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
  3. Daniel v. TaylorSupreme Court of Florida · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walker v. LeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  2. Ramsey v. City of KissimmeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. Ropes v. MinshewSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  4. Johnson v. RhodesSupreme Court of Florida · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API