United States v. Cornejo-Sandoval
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Hilario Cornejo-Sandoval appeals his conviction, alleging violations of his procedural and substantive due process rights. Specifically, Defendant contends the district court erred by (1) failing to order a second competency hearing during trial based on Defendant’s unusual behavior, and (2) allowing him to be tried and convicted while incompetent. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.
I
In late 2005, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement opened an investigation based on information provided by Barbaro Veloz, a/k/a “El Pequeño” (“The…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Billy Keith McGregor v. Gary Gibson, Warden, Oklahoma State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- United States v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Lay v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. RendonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
- Lam Luong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.