Legal Opinion

Farmer v. Kelleys Island Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1994No. 93-441PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

This case addresses the procedures to be followed, under R.C. 3319.11 and 3319.111, before a board of education can decide not to renew the limited contract between itself and a teacher.

I

Farmer contends that when Superintendent Acierto recommended that her contract be renewed, the board had no authority to decline to renew the contract. We disagree.

*158In support of her contentions, Farmer cites R.C. 3319.11(E), which provides:

“Any teacher employed under a limited contract and not eligible to be considered for a continuing contract, is, at the expiration of such limited contract, considered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Justus v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Naylor v. Cardinal Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Kiel v. Green Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Farmer v. Kelleys Island Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Farmer v. Kelleys Island Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Kiel v. Green Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API