Legal Opinion

Torrence v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 12, 1991No. 90-96PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the defendant William Torrence from final judgments of conviction and sentences for (1) manslaughter with a firearm, and (2) unlawful possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

First, we conclude that the trial court did not, as urged, commit any error in instructing the jury in accord with Flor-ida Standard Jury Instruction (Criminal) 2.03, that:

“If you have a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty. If you have no reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.”

In our view, this instruction…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Carawan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  5. Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. People v. SandersAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. People v. SandersAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. State of Washington v. Darrell F. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API