Legal Opinion

Alvarez v. Kijakazi

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided March 4, 2024No. 5:22-cv-01275Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION STEPHANIE ALVAREZ, § § Plaintiff, § SA-22-CV-01275-ESC § vs. § § KILOLO KIJAKAZI, § § Defendant. § ORDER Before the Court in the above-styled cause of action is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act [#25]. By her motion, Plaintiff asks the Court to award her attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), as the “prevailing party” in the above-styled cause of action. The EAJA provides a mandatory attorney’s fee…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baker v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  2. Patrick Breaux, Ssn: Sdw-Um-Wkqt v. United States Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API