Legal Opinion

Belin v. Secretary of the Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 19, 1972PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReardon, J.

The petitioners, residents, taxpayers, and duly registered voters in Cambridge, have petitioned for a writ of mandamus. The facts are not in dispute.

Cambridge has a Plan E form of government conformable to G. L. c. 43, §§ 93-116, as amended, and is the only city or town in the Commonwealth where officers are elected by proportional representation or preferential voting. The respondent was in the process of preparing a question contained in St. 1972, c. 596, § 3, to be placed on the official ballot for the November 7, 1972, biennial State election in Cambridge. The question described in § 3…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Opinions of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  2. Mayor of Gloucester v. City Clerk of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  3. Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Board of Appeals of Hanover v. Housing Appeals Comm.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Del Duca v. Town Administrator of MethuenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Emerson College v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Mayor of Boston v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Edwards v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API