Legal Opinion

People v. Mature Enterprises, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 14, 1974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon review of the film, “ Deep Throat ”, we find it constitutionally obscene under both the statutory and decisional guidelines (Penal Law, § 235.00; Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15; Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49; Peo*661ple v. Heller, 29 N Y 2d 319, upon rearg. 33 N Y 2d 314; Redlich v. Capri Cinema, 43 A D 2d 27, 29).

Since defendant is a corporation, ‘ ‘ the only penal sanction that can be used is a fine ” (Preiser, Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons. Laws, Book 39, p. 166); a fine is the sole penalty (Penal Law, § 80.10). Hence, defendant was not entitled to trial by jury…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mangum v. Maryland State Board of CensorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. People v. Select Tire Co., New York County Courts1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API