Legal Opinion

Pinto v. EMC Mortgage Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 1, 1997No. 97-0234PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARIENTE, Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment of reforeclosure in favor of appellee, EMC Mortgage. However, we reverse the amount of the judgment. See Tejedo v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 673 So.2d 959 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Appellant, Pinto, is entitled to pay the redemption amount he would have been required to pay if he had been joined in the first foreclosure and had elected to redeem promptly upon the filing of the first foreclosure. See Quinn Plumbing Co. v. New Miami Shores Corp., 100 Fla. 413, 129 So. 690 (1930); Thecsuccess Corp. v. Graham, 577 So.2d 590 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991);…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Quinn Plumbing Co. Inc. v. New Miami Shores Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Tejedo v. Secretary of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Thecsuccess Corp. v. GrahamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. English v. Bankers Trust Co. of California, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. LUCKY NATION, LLC and NINA SOLONENKO v. HASSAN AL-MAGHAZCHIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API