Legal Opinion
Brodack v. Morsbach
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 1905No. 5181PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurs-ton county, Linn, J., entered January 21, 1901, upon findings in favor of the defendants, .after a trial before the court without a jury, dismissing on the merits an action to quiet title.
1Per curiam
On the 20th day of March, 1891, one John Bannse, being the owner of the E % of the S E % of Sec. 22, Tp. 15 N., R. 2 West, entered into an agreement with Emile Morsbach and Rudolph Morsbach, defendants in this action, reciting that,
“Said party of the first part [Bannse] for and in consideration of the sum of one hundred and ten dollars, gold coin of the United States of America to him in hand paid, agrees to sell to the said parties of the second part, all the mill timber situated on the following described land for their use and benefit: The east half of the south east quarter of section…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bank of Lansingburgh v. CraryNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- Hunt v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Warren v. LelandNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- Latta v. CliffordU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1891
- Templet v. BakerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1856
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Elmonte Investment Co. v. Schafer Bros. Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
- France v. Deep River Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- McDowell v. BeckhamWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Petticrew v. GreenshieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Bell v. Scranton Coal Mines Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.