Philip Mangone Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
BOOTH, Chief Justice.
The plaintiff in this ease concedes an excise tax liability. The petition is for the recovery of what is alleged as excessive excise taxes levied and collected contrary to the law and regulations of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
Plaintiff is a New York corporation, engaged in manufacturing dresses, cloaks, and suits. It made its excise tax returns for the years 1919, 1920, and 1921 on garments manufactured and sold by it and paid the taxes shown to be due thereon. In April, 1922, the plaintiff’s books of account and records were examined, and as a result thereof…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lash's Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- J. Hungerford Smith Grape Juice Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. William J. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Flynn v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
- Sutor v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
- Collins v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
- Howard M. Reineman and Helen Reineman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.