Link v. General Ins. Co. of America
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
BOWEN, District Judge.
The respondent’s .exception to the sufficiency of the amended libel raises for decision the sole question whether the damage to their vessel sustained by libelants as the result of a collision between their vessel “Eastern Prince” and the “U. S. S. Roustabout,” a Navy tanker, was a “consequence of war like operations” of either vessel and particularly of the Navy tanker. The insurance policy on which libelants sue insures against such a war risk.
Here upon such exception we accept as true the facts alleged in the amended libel that the Navy tanker, officered, manned and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Queen Insurance Co. of America v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- ætna Ins. Co. v. Houston Oil & Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- Mellon v. Federal Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1926
- Aetna Insurance v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Earle & Stoddart, Inc. v. Ellerman's Wilson Line, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of New Jersey. Standard Oil Co. Of New Jersey v. United States. The Yms-12. The John WorthingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- United States v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Nordling v. GibbonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1945
- Link v. General Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1948