Legal Opinion

Frey v. Cleveland Trust Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1944No. 29816PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

The single question presented by the plaintiff relates to the nature of the warrant of attorney in the cognovit note. If it is joint and several the judgment of the Court of Appeals must be af firmed; but if it is merely joint the defendant’s judgment lien is invalid and there must be an affirmance of' the decree of the Court of Common Pleas quieting the-plaintiff’s title to the realty on which the levy was. made.

It is the contention of the plaintiff that the warrant, of attorney authorizes the entry of appearance, waiver of process and confession of a judgment as to both Eugene and Mabel B.…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Haggard v. ShickOhio Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API