William C. Fendley, Jr. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
The defendant was in state custody at the time of his interrogation by the FBI. The interrogation was an important part of the federal criminal proceedings which had obviously then focused on the defendant. As was the case in Miranda this was an interrogation “in a police-dominated atmosphere.” Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 445, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). At a hearing conducted by the district judge on the admissibility of a statement by the defendant taken at that interrogation, the FBI agent testified that the defendant was advised that he “had the right to remain…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- William James Evans v. United States of America, George William Bruton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
3Cited by44 opinions
- David Matthew Lathers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
- United States of America Ex Rel. Ruben Williams v. John Twomey and Peter BensingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Robert William Bendelow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Cordell CassellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.