Legal Opinion

Passalacqua v. Tomko

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1987PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint should have been granted because plaintiff failed to meet the threshold of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Subjective complaints of the plaintiff without medical foundation are insufficient to establish a prima facie case of serious injury within the purview of the statute (Costa v Billingsley, 127 AD2d 990; Doyle v Erie County Water Auth., 113 AD2d 1016). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Henry, J. — summary judgment.) Present —…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Costa v. BillingsleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Doyle v. Erie County Water AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cavallaro v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API