Legal Opinion
Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Robinson Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 10, 1985No. Adv. 4-84-0096PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
FREEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before me on plaintiff/debtor Mohawk Industries’ motion for referral to the bankruptcy court. Defendant Robinson Industries opposes debtor’s motion. Because I find that debtor’s action against defendant is not a “core” proceeding within the meaning of § 157(b) of the Bankruptcy Amendments and Federal Judgeship Act of 1984 (“1984 Act”), 28 U.S.C., § 157(b), and because the parties have demanded a jury trial, I must deny debtor’s motion for referral.
Debtor was under contract to supply the United States Department of Defense with some small…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Atlas Automation, Inc. v. Jensen, Inc. (In Re Atlas Automation, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
3Cited by65 opinions
- In Re ARNOLD PRINT WORKS, INC., Debtor. ARNOLD PRINT WORKS, INC., Appellant, v. Joseph APKIN, Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- In Re Castlerock Properties, Debtor. Piombo Corporation, a California Corporation v. Castlerock Properties, a California Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Acolyte Electric Corp. v. City of New YorkUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- 18 Collier bankr.cas.2d 34, Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,032, 5 Ucc rep.serv.2d 354 in Re Meyertech Corp., Debtor. Southeastern Sprinkler Company, Inc. v. Meyertech CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Braucher v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. (In Re Illinois-California Express, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1985
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.