Legal Opinion

McCaffrey v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 6, 1936No. 13,536Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holland

The plaintiff in error will herein be referred to as plaintiff, and the defendant in error as defendant.

In May, 1929, plaintiff sold to the defendant certain real property, and as a part of the transaction, defendant gave plaintiff his promissory note for $200 due in two years, secured by a second deed of trust on the premises conveyed, which note is the subject matter of this litigation. Prior to maturity of the note, plaintiff placed it with Feigel, a practicing attorney of Boulder, Colorado, *469for collection. Defendant sold the property to one ShinMe who on the trial testified that he…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Ware v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Julius Kessler & Co. v. PareliusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. Richardson Drug Co. v. DunaganColorado Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Yentzer v. ThayerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API