Legal Opinion

Bourdo v. Preston

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, C. J.

In view of the contentions of the parties on these appeals, it suffices to note the following matters. The plaintiff, Earl Bourdo, alleged in his complaint in each action that defendant, Mary S. Preston, owned and resided on a tract of land in the town of Muskego and that on about June 1, 1949, and September 28, 1949, respectively, at the special instance and request of defendant’s son, Franklin Preston, d/b/a Preston Builders, as agent for defendant, the plaintiff as a contractor commenced doing plumbing work and furnishing materials in and about the construction of a dwelling on each of two…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Akers v. Kirke & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. H. C. Behrens Lumber Co. v. LagerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Inter-State Building & Loan Ass'n v. AyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Inter-State Building & Loan Ass'n v. AyersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
  5. Union Trust Co. of Maryland v. RodemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Woodlawn Park Ltd. v. Doster Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Christensen v. DormanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  3. In re SchmidtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1962
  4. In the Matter of Richard Francis Schmidt, Bankrupt. L. C. Christensen v. Henry Dorman, Trustee, in the Matter of Floyd Donald Schmidt, Bankrupt. L. C. Christensen v. Henry Dorman, Trustee, in the Matter of Floyd Donald Schmidt, Bankrupts. L. C. Christensen v. Henry Dorman, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API