Wronski v. Frankford Trust Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
The appellant, Frankford Trust Company, is not a mutual savings bank. In connection with its regular business it conducts a savings department. The appellee, Joseph Wronski, was a depositor in this department. His pass book, evidencing his deposits, contained certain printed rules and regulations, one of which required the production of the book when deposits were made, and another was similar in substance to the bylaws or rules set forth in Peoples Savings Bank v. Cupps, 91 Pa. 315; Burrill v. Dollar Savings Bank, 92 Pa. 134, and Bulakowski v. Phila. S. F. Society, 270…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bulakowski v. Philadelphia Saving Fund SocietySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Burrill v. Dollar Savings BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
- Peoples' Savings Bank v. CuppsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thomas v. First Nat. Bank of ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Keller v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Saji v. Phila. Saving Fund SocietySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Sheeran v. First National Bank, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1951
- Thomas v. First Nat. Bank of ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.