Legal Opinion
State Dept. of Trans. v. Steinman, Inc., No. Cv 97 0571964 (May 27, 1998)
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided May 27, 1998No. CV 97 0571964UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER AND TO QUASH #111
The plaintiff objects to and moves to quash the defendants' subpoena duces tecum; and the plaintiff moves for a protective order prohibiting the defendants from deposing its counsel.
The plaintiff, state of Connecticut ("state"), acting through its Department of Transportation ("DOT"), brought this action against the defendants, Steinman Boynton Gronquist Birdsall, Inc. ("Steinman, Inc.") and the partnership of Steinman Boynton Gronquist Birdsall…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Waste Management, Inc. v. International Surplus Lines InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. HannaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Remington Arms Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1992
- State v. BurakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Rienzo v. SantangeloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dedham-Westwood Water District v. National Union Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 2000
- Dedham-Westwood Water District v. National Union Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 2000