Grinter v. Haag

Plaintiff-appellant James Grinter was injured while riding as a passenger in an automobile owned by him and being driven by his wife, Lonita Grinter, as the result of a collision with defendant-appellee Thomas Haag. In the Grinters’ action against Haag, the jury returned a verdict in Haag’s favor. Thereupon, James initiated this appeal presenting the following issues for review:(1) Whether the court erred in instructing the jury on the doctrine of joint enterprise.(2) Whether the court erred in instructing the jury on the doctrine of imputed negligence based upon the principle of ownership of…