Legal Opinion

Smith v. Mangum

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 6, 1987No. 1 CA-SA 203PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Chief Judge.

Beverly Smith (Mrs. Smith) and Edward Gant filed this special action seeking relief from a trial court order that compelled them to disclose whether they have had sexual relations. The inquiry arose during discovery in an action that Dr. David Smith (Dr. Smith) filed seeking modification of his spousal maintenance obligation to his ex-wife, Mrs. Smith. This opinion follows our order of July 15, 1987, in which we accepted jurisdiction in this special action proceeding and granted the relief requested by Mrs. Smith and Mr. Gant.

The marriage of Dr. Smith and Mrs. Smith…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rubisoff v. RubisoffMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Taake v. TaakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Brister v. BristerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Cook v. CookArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Hodges v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marriage of Myers v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Lucas v. LucasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Gilman v. GilmanNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Marriage of Barnett v. JedynakCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API