Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Smith
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMAN, Justice.
This attorney disciplinary matter is before us for de novo review in accordance with Iowa Supreme Court rule 118.10. The Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct (hereinafter “board”) charged respondent, William S. Smith, with violating probate rules, misleading the court regarding his claim for compensation, and taking an excessive fee. Following hearing, a division of the grievance commission found the allegations substantiated and recommended a public reprimand. Because we believe Smith’s unethical conduct warrants a more severe sanction, we suspend his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. RameySupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. EvansSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. BaudinoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. CoddingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Verla Jean BartleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Karen A. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. KersenbrockCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2012
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. FreemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. GallnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.