Legal Opinion
Arkansas Fertilizer Co. v. Banks
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided May 9, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from Sevier Circuit Court; Tames S. Steel, Judge; An agent must account to his principal for moneys collected, and he cannot defend on the ground of illegality. 48 Ark. 487; 23 Ark. 390. An account stated can only be impeached on -the ground of fraud. 13 Ark. 609; 21 Ark. 420; 41 Ark. 502; 47 Ark. 541; 55 Ark. 376; 64- Ark. 39; 68 Ark. 534; 72 Ark. 234; 80 Ark. 438; Id. 469-
1Opinion of the CourtBattle, J.
The Arkansas Fertilizer Company, for cause of action against J. N. Banks and W. C. Brummett, alleges:
“That plaintiff is a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Arkansas, with its principal place of business at Little Rock, Arkansas. That defendants, J. N. Banks and W. C. Brummett, are indebted to plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars and seventy-two cents, with interest frorh December 1, 1908, at the rate of eight per cent, per annum, as- evidenced by a certain promissory note, which in words and figures is as follows, towit:
“…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weed v. DyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
- Dunavant v. FieldsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
- Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Choctaw Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Allen-West Commission Co. v. HudginsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Bagnell Tie & Timber Co. v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Boatner v. Gates Bros. LumberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
- Daugherty v. MerrifieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Bentonville Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932