Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Cohen

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1981PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reinstated.

The board’s decision had. a rational basis. What constitutes vacation pay is determined by the collective bargaining agreement. The fact that that agreement called for both “vacation pay” and “summer pay” and that the summer pay did not equal claimant’s prior rate of pay *661could, considered alone, lead to the conclusion that the summer pay was deferred compensation. There are, however, counterbalancing factors which furnish…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of McNeillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. In re Claims of SummersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. In re the Claim of CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API