Cunningham v. State

WEBSTER, Judge.

In this direct criminal appeal, appellant seeks review of his convictions of purchase of marijuana, or possession of marijuana with intent to purchase it; and of attempted possession of more than twenty grams of marijuana. Appellant raises four issues: (1) whether it was error to deny his motion to dismiss and subsequent motion for judgment of acquittal based upon an entrapment defense; (2) whether it was error to deny his motion to dismiss based upon allegations that the state had failed to produce certain exculpatory evidence; (3) whether it was error to deny his motion for…