Legal Opinion

Burnett v. INA

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 31, 1991No. 2-90-227-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LATTIMORE, Justice.

This is a workers’ compensation case. The issue in this appeal is whether appellant was in the course and scope of her employment when she was injured while playing softball at a company-sponsored picnic. The trial court granted a summary judgment in favor of the workers’ compensation insurance carrier.

We affirm.

Appellant, Mavis Burnett, was employed by General Dynamics in the materials department. Appellant was injured while warming up for a softball game at a company-sponsored picnic. Appellee, INA, filed a motion for summary judgment contending that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Farley v. Prudential Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Texas General Indemnity Company v. BottomTexas Supreme Court · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moi v. State, Department of Public SafetyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Morris James, LLP v. WellerSuperior Court of Delaware · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API