Legal Opinion

Beamish v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 8, 1955No. 99-54PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaramore, Judge

Plaintiff, a colonel in the United States Army Reserve, on inactive duty, seeks to have the Court determine that he is eligible for placement upon the Army temporary disability retired list, and to grant him retirement pay in accordance with the provisions of Section 402 (a) of the Career Compensation Act of 1949,1 from and after February 18,1958.

On December 30, 1922, plaintiff accepted an appointment as a Reserve Officer in the United States Army. Thereafter he was reappointed and promoted at various times and he is now a Reserve Officer in the United States Army in the grade of colonel. He…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holliday v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wales v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  2. Furlong v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  3. Wesolowski v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  4. Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  5. Uhley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API