Tushner v. United States District Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:
This case presents a novel question of time calculation under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In calculating the ten-day period for filing a jury demand in a removed case, FecLR.Civ.P. 81(c), the plaintiffs in the district court excluded intervening Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays. Such exclusions are permitted in calculating any period of less than eleven days, Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(a), and, the plaintiffs reasoned, this grace period necessarily applies to the ten-day jury demand requirement of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 81(c).
The trial judge thought there…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Nalty v. Nalty Tree FarmDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1987
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tushner v. United States District Court For The Central District Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Berman v. Congressional Towers Ltd. Partnership-Section IDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- CNPq—Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Technologico v. Inter-Trade, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Mullins v. HinkleDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1997
- Cnpq--Conselho Nacional De Desenvolvimento Cientifico E Technologico v. Inter-Trade, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.