Legal Opinion
McConnaughy v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 13, 1996No. 96-3189PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
684 So.2d 851 (1996)
Mathew P. McCONNAUGHY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-3189.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
December 13, 1996.
Mathew P. McConnaughy, Polk City, Pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
2Per curiam
Mathew P. McConnaughy timely appeals the trial court's order summarily denying his Rule 3.850 motion, which alleges two claims of involuntariness of plea. The trial court denied his motion on the basis that it was untimely for purposes of Rule 3.850. We affirm, but not for the reason stated by the trial court, as will be explained.
McConnaughy in his first claim…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Gwong v. SingletarySupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
4Cited by3 opinions
- Alexander v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Hatchett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Howard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997