Legal Opinion

Tilburg v. Northern Central Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1907No. Appeal, No. 313PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, No. 313, Jan. T., 1906, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Lycoming Co., Dec. T., 1905, No. 217, refusing to take off nonsuit in case of Mary Tilburg y. Northern Central Railway Company. Trespass to recover damages for death of plaintiff’s husband. Before Hart, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned, was refusal to take off nonsuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Mestrezat,

This is an action of trespass to recover damages for the death of Robert D. Tilburg, the plaintiff’s husband. In the afternoon of January 3, 1905, he arid his son Edward purchased tickets at Williamsport, Lycoming county, over the defendant’s road for Cogan Valley station. At the same time *620one Charles Stamets purchased a ticket for Haleeka, a flag station about one mile beyond Cogan Valley, and the three parties entered and took seats together in a coach of the same train. Soon after the train left Williamsport, the conductor asked Tilburg for his ticket who,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. WernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  2. Malone v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Arnold v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  4. Ham v. Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Cleaver v. Pennsylvania Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Meyers v. Keokuk Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  4. Tilburg v. Northern Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Weathers v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API