Legal Opinion

Rothschild v. World-Wide Automobiles Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1966PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MemoRAndum. Order granting summary judgment dismissing complaint affirmed, with costs to defendant-respondent. Plaintiffs do not establish in support of their complaint and in opposition to the motion for summary judgment that they had a contract which could form a basis for a cause of action against defendant-respondent for interference; nor do they in any event show facts which would impute a personal liability to defendant-respondent for acts of tort chargeable to the corporations of which the latter was an officer and director. The causes of action based upon purported restraint of trade…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Citicorp Retail Services Inc. v. Wellington Mercantile Services Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Vardi v. Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. John Coleman v. Golkin, Bomback & Co., Inc., a Corporation and Saul GolkinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. Stern v. H. DiMarzo, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Di Nardo v. L & W Industrial Park of Buffalo, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API