Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Katz

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 7, 1950PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This is an action of contract to recover a balance of $69 for moneys lent, now admitted by the defendant to be due. The matter in dispute relates to a claim stated by the defendant in a declaration in set-off wherein it is alleged that the plaintiffs are jointly indebted to the defendant in the sum of $1,000. The case is before us after a verdict for the plaintiff in set-off, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, on the exception of the defendants in set-off, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiffs, to the denial of their motion for a directed verdict on the first count of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. CunninghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Noble v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. Murray v. CarothersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
  4. Stone v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. Gassett v. GlazierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Norton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Twin Fires Investment, LLC v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  3. Power Service Supply, Inc. v. E. W. Wiggins Airways, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  4. Guleserian v. Pilgrim Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  5. Cetrone v. Paul Livoli, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API