Legal Opinion

Hochhalter v. Great Western Enterprises, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1985No. 85-48PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Justice.

This case involves the rendering of a judgment by default under Rule 55, W.R. C.P. Appellants contend that the district court abused its discretion in refusing to set aside the default judgment. They urge that the judgment should have been set aside pursuant to Rules 60(b)(6) and 55(b)(2), W.R.C.P., 1 because the neglect of their counsel justified such relief and because they did not receive the notice required by Rule 55(b)(2). We hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to set aside the default judgment and that, under the facts of this case,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm BeechCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. H. F. Livermore Corporation v. Aktiengesellschaft Gebruder LoepfeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  4. United States v. Salvatore Cirami, Salvatore Cirami & Margaret CiramiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Salvatore Cirami, Salvatore Cirami & Margaret CiramiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cordova v. GosarWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Vanasse v. RamsayWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Estate of Dahlke ex rel. Jubie v. DahlkeWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Midway Oil Corp. v. GuessWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Bruegman v. BruegmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API