Legal Opinion
Joseph E. Piatt v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 20, 1964No. 18118_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Counsel appointed by this court to represent the appellant have presented for our consideration, by brief and oral argument, the only issues fairly raised by the record. Having examined these issues, we find them without sufficient merit to warrant reversal. Assigned counsel’s effort, however, in presenting the issues available, and thus insuring an appeal for an indigent defendant, is in the best tradition of the bar.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Richard E. Leigh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Clayborne Jamison, Jr., United States of America v. Clayborne Jamison, Sr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Richard G. Augenblick v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Richard E. Leigh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Anthony Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Anthony Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965