Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Hughes

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 20, 1993No. 1 CA-CV 90-291PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIDEL, Judge.

James Hughes (husband) appeals from the trial court’s order that he pay $2100 per month in spousal maintenance until the death or remarriage of Aurora Hughes (wife). Husband argues that the award was excessive in duration and asks that we limit it to thirty months. We remand because the trial court did not make findings sufficient to sustain an award of indefinite duration. We leave it to the trial court to redetermine an appropriate award in light of the circumstances at the time of remand.

I

James and Aurora Hughes were married in 1982. Their marriage lasted seven years.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marriage of Elliott v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  2. Schroeder v. SchroederArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Sommerfield v. SommerfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. In Re the Marriage of HinkstonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. Hardin v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hart v. Seven Resorts Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API