Legal Opinion

Application of Vincent Yettito, Jr

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 9, 1960No. Patent Appeal 6489PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the examiner’s rejection of the single claim prosecuted, without amendment, before the Patent Office in appellant’s application Serial No. 440,324, entitled “Bowling Ball.”

Appellant’s bowling ball, the type having thumb and finger holes such as used in “big pin” or “ten pin” bowling, is provided with an adjustable span between the thumb and finger holes in a manner succinctly set forth in the claim which reads:

“A bowling ball having an adjustable span between thumb and finger…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Application of Wesley Nathaniel KarlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Application of John M. Hardy, William B. Taylor and Wilber H. Griffin. Application of William B. Taylor, John M. Hardy, and Wilber H. GriffinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API