Welsbach Electric Corp. v. MasTec North America, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rosenblatt, J.
For well over a century, parties to construction contracts in New York were permitted by decisional law and by statute to *627agree to “pay-if-paid” provisions. Agreements of that type create a condition precedent by which the subcontractor will not be paid unless the contractor has been paid. In 1995, however, we held in West-Fair Elec. Contrs. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. (87 NY2d 148 [1995]) that such contracts violate New York’s public policy as expressed in Lien Law § 34. That section provides in pertinent part: “Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. GiancontieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Greenfield v. Philles Records, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Vermont Teddy Bear Co. v. 538 Madison Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Cooney v. Osgood Machinery, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Welsbach Elec v. Mastec N. AmNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Follman v. World Financial Network National BankDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Trinity Christian Center of Santa Ana, Inc. v. Koper (In re Koper)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Hilton Worldwide, Inc. Global Benefits Administrative Committee v. Caesars Entertainment Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Dancor Construction, Inc. v. FXR Construction, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.