Legal Opinion

United States v. Osborne

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided June 13, 2007No. 07-10018Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MIHM, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Lawrence Osborne, Jr.’s Motion to Suppress Evidence [# 9]. For the reasons set forth below, Osborne’s Motion to Suppress Evidence is GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

Defendant Lawrence Osborne (“Osborne”) has filed a Motion to suppress evidence seized by the East Peoria Police Department in connection with the im-poundment and inventory search of his motor vehicle. The facts surrounding this matter are not in dispute. On July 25, 2006, East Peoria police officer Martin was called to Tony and Sons Autobody Shop (“Shop”). The Shop also tows vehicles for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Florida v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Arizona v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. United States v. Christopher DuguayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API