Espinoza v. Gurule
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
We will refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court where plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs and defendant in error was defendant.
In a second amended complaint plaintiffs alleged that they were the parents of Florencio Luis Espinoza, who was born in October, 1937; that in August, 1954, in Las Animas County, the defendant wrongfully fired upon and killed the plaintiffs’ son with a firearm; and that by reason thereof, the plaintiffs incurred and. became liable for funeral expenses in the sum of $501.05, for which they demanded judgment against defendant, with interest and costs.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Publix Cab Co. v. Colorado National Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- Hansen v. HayesOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Tadlock v. LloydSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
- Dillon v. Sterling Rendering Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1940
- Kling v. PhayerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- e Trust Life Ins. Co. v. Estate of CasperSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- United States v. Shirley Haskin, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles D. Haskin, Deceased, and Transco Contracting Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Estate of Kronemeyer v. MeinigColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Hernandez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1974