Legal Opinion

Espinoza v. Gurule

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 7, 1960No. 19091PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We will refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court where plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs and defendant in error was defendant.

In a second amended complaint plaintiffs alleged that they were the parents of Florencio Luis Espinoza, who was born in October, 1937; that in August, 1954, in Las Animas County, the defendant wrongfully fired upon and killed the plaintiffs’ son with a firearm; and that by reason thereof, the plaintiffs incurred and. became liable for funeral expenses in the sum of $501.05, for which they demanded judgment against defendant, with interest and costs.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Publix Cab Co. v. Colorado National Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  2. Hansen v. HayesOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Tadlock v. LloydSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  4. Dillon v. Sterling Rendering Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  5. Kling v. PhayerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. e Trust Life Ins. Co. v. Estate of CasperSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  2. United States v. Shirley Haskin, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles D. Haskin, Deceased, and Transco Contracting Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  3. Estate of Kronemeyer v. MeinigColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Hernandez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API