Legal Opinion

Gardner v. City of Boston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 4, 1876PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.

A case pending in the Superior Court against the city of Boston, upon a petition for a jury to revise an assessment of benefits caused to the petitioner’s estate by the extension of a street, was referred to arbitrators, by agreement of the parties *267under a rule of court. They awarded a certain sum as the value of the benefit, and also that the city recover that sum with interest from a given date, making a sum total named in the award.

F. B. SoThier J. E. Hudson, for the petitioner. J. P. Healy, for the respondent.

A motion in the Superior Court to recommit the award with an order to strike out…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. President of Harvard College v. Board of AldermenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Boston Seamen's Friend Society v. Mayor of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  3. Ellicott v. CoffinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bradley v. BordenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Doherty v. Phoenix InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Giles v. Royal InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Electric Supply & Maintenance Co. v. Conway Electric Light & Power Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  5. Cowley v. DobbinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API