Legal Opinion

In Re Petition of Schwermann v. Reinhart

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 15, 1973No. 43806PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Todd, justice.

Petitioners sought the establishment of a drainage ditch in Nicollet County. The county board ordered the establishment of the ditch, but upon objectors’ appeal to the district court, the proceedings were dismissed. We reverse and remand.

A petition to establish a drainage ditch was properly filed with the county board pursuant to Minn. St. c. 106. The county board, pursuant to the provisions thereof, proceeded to order the estab lishment of the ditch and assigned to the proceeding the title County Ditch No. 93. This ditch would drain approximately 2,700 acres within the county.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stronge & Lightner Co. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Schultz v. County of ChippewaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Black v. Northwestern Nat. Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Johnson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. Balbach v. MoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Madison v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Miller-Lagro v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Madison v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API