Legal Opinion

Laycock v. City of Baton Rouge

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 15, 1883No. 8513PublishedCited by 11 opinions

' * PPE AL from the Seventeenth District Court, Parish of East Baton il Rouge. Sherburne, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Bermudez, C. J.

The plaintiff seeks to hold the City' of Baton Rouge liable for a supply of gas during stated periods. .

*476To this end he instituted three suits: one in the name of the stockholders of the Gas Co., (of whom he was one) as holders of warrants issued by the City.for the gas supplied, and two others, in his own ñamó, also as warrant holder.

After an exception to the first suit, requiring the disclosure of the, names of the stockholders which he claimed to represent, the plaintiff, filed a supplemental petition, alleging himself the owner of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Argenti v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Police Jury v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smart v. Board of County Com'rs of Craig CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Rauch v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Spilman v. City of ParkersburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Smith v. Town of VintonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
  5. County of Los Angeles v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API