In re the Board of Water Supply
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the claimants, Frank V. Bishop and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Ulster Special Term and entered in the office of clerk of the county of Ulster on the 23d day of June, 1913, refusing confirmation of an award made to claimants of $7,250 by Business Damage Commission No. 1, Ashokan Reservoir, in their thirteenth separató report.
1Opinion of the Court
Woodward, J.:
Frank V. and Deforest Bishop claim to have been the owners and proprietors of a boarding house and livery business *280upon a tract of land known as parcel 15, section 1, Ashokan reservoir, which was taken into physical possession by the city of New York in the developing of its new water supply under the provisions of chapter 724 of the Laws of 1905 and the amendments thereto, and this proceeding was instituted under the provisions of section 42 of that act, as amended by chapter 314 of the Laws of 1906. The commissioners have made an award of $7,250 to these claimants, and the"…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Riggs v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- In re the Board of Water SupplyNew York Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re HuieNew York Supreme Court · 1958