Randolph Thomas McArty v. State of Arkansas
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
2022 Ark. 90
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-93-1071 Opinion Delivered: April 14, 2022 RANDALL THOMAS MCARTY PETITIONER PRO SE FOURTH PETITION TO V. REINVEST JURISDICTION IN THE TRIAL COURT TO CONSIDER A STATE OF ARKANSAS PETITION FOR A WRIT OF RESPONDENT ERROR CORAM NOBIS AND MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL [CLARK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NO. 10CR-92-111] PETITION AND MOTION DENIED. BARBARA W. WEBB, Justice Petitioner Randall Thomas McArty brings this pro se petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis in his criminal case.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- State v. LarimoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Randall McArty v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025