Legal Opinion

National City Bank v. Facilities Asset Management, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 27, 2001No. 78410PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Karpinski, Administrative Judge.

Defendants-appellants Facilities Asset Management, Inc. (“FAM”), M & M Properties (“M&M”), and Michael and Maureen Badalamenti appeal from an order of the trial court denying their Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from cognovit judgments against them.

On February 4, 2000, National City Bank (“NCB”) commenced this action against FAM to collect on a cognovit note and against the remaining defendants on cognovit guarantees of FAM’s indebtedness on the note. The note had an original principal balance of $500,000. The administrative judge of the common pleas court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cuyahoga County Bd. of Mental Retardation v. Association of Cuyahoga County Teachers of the Trainable RetardedOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Ameritrust Co. v. MurrayOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. OgleDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
  4. Schaub v. Welfare Finance Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Norman v. Tradewinds Airlines, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
  2. Morgan v. Mikhail, 08ap-87 (9-11-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API