State Highway Department v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
1. The judgment appealed from states: “After hearing argument of counsel for both parties, the court hereby sustains ground 4 of the motion for new trial.” In the present state of the law, our first decision must be whether this court, on the first grant of a new trial, may limit its review to the question of law raised by this special ground, or whether no reversal may be had unless it appears that a contrary verdict is demanded by the evidence as a whole. Code Ann. § 6-1608 is based on Ga. L. 1959, p. 353, which the Supreme Court construed in CTC Finance Corp. v. Holden, 221 Ga.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cox v. GradySupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- CTC Finance Corporation v. HoldenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Taylor v. WarrenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Trammell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Speer v. Gemco Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Lawson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004