Legal Opinion

State Highway Department v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 9, 1968No. 43369PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

1. The judgment appealed from states: “After hearing argument of counsel for both parties, the court hereby sustains ground 4 of the motion for new trial.” In the present state of the law, our first decision must be whether this court, on the first grant of a new trial, may limit its review to the question of law raised by this special ground, or whether no reversal may be had unless it appears that a contrary verdict is demanded by the evidence as a whole. Code Ann. § 6-1608 is based on Ga. L. 1959, p. 353, which the Supreme Court construed in CTC Finance Corp. v. Holden, 221 Ga.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cox v. GradySupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. CTC Finance Corporation v. HoldenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  3. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Taylor v. WarrenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  5. Trammell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Speer v. Gemco Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. Lawson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API