Legal Opinion

Vigil v. Haber

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1994No. 21187PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANCHINI, Justice.

Glenn Haber appeals from an order adjudging that Haber’s former fiancee, Jannel M. Vigil, should be given permanent possession of an engagement ring she received from Haber. We hold that the ring was a conditional gift dependent upon the parties’ marriage, that the question of whose fault it was that the engagement was broken is irrelevant, and that therefore the ring should be returned to Haber.

Facts and proceedings. Haber and Vigil exchanged engagement rings in February 1992. Unfortunately, their relationship deteriorated and each accused the other of threats and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gaden v. GadenNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Brown v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  3. Dixon v. DixonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Fierro v. HoelCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1990
  5. State Ex Rel. DuBois v. RyanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Heiman v. ParrishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. Albinger v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Campbell v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  4. In Re StoltzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  5. Albinger v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API