Legal Opinion

McNeny v. Railroad Commission of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 4, 1936No. 8491PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McClendon, chief justice.

This is a rule 37 (oil well spacing rule) case. The merits of the controversy concern the right of appellee Bering Oil Company (called defendant for convenience) to drill an oil well upon a 1/4-acre tract in the East Texas Oil Field. The questions which the appeal involves do not, however, concern the merits of the controversy, but only questions of procedure are raised, alternately, by one side or the other. The controlling record facts, stated chronologically, follow (all dates are in 1935, except as otherwise stated) :

August 7th, appellants (called plaintiffs for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alpha Petroleum Co. v. TerrellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  2. Alpha Petroleum Co. v. TerrellTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Stewart v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. North Texas Coach Co. v. MortenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Barnsdall Oil Co. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Wald Transfer & Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. State ex rel. Public Service Commission v. Boone Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State Ex Rel. Pub. Serv. Comm. v. Boone CC, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Railroad Commission of Texas v. WenckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API